The Immorality of Trump’s War with Iran Matters
Anyone who cares about American greatness must also refuse to allow us to become the kind of society that shrugs off the crimes our government commits in our name and with our money.
Anyone who cares about American greatness must also refuse to allow us to become the kind of society that shrugs off the crimes our government commits in our name and with our money.
The Fed Chair’s job isn’t to stabilize the economy. It’s to use prestige, technical jargon, and mind-numbing dullness to cover for the central bank’s expropriation of the American people. And Alan Greenspan excelled at that.
Leftists sarcastically asking where the money for this war will come from are right about the GOP’s hypocrisy, but wrong to imply that it actually means there's plenty to spend on all these government programs. We can’t afford any of this.
Central bankers don’t fear Trump “politicizing” the Fed. They fear he’ll expose it already is.
Elon Musk becoming the world’s first trillionaire has triggered a familiar round of progressive outrage. But the imprecise focus on wealth distribution obscures the real issue: how much of modern wealth is acquired through politics rather than production.
Even hawkish foreign policy scholars admit that changing the US security setup in Greenland is unnecessary.
The latest release of Epstein files again highlighted how disgusted and frustrated people have grown with the current elites. Yet they remain essentially untouchable. Why?
If the Iranian regime were truly trying to sacrifice their entire country to commit a nation-level nuclear murder-suicide against Israel and the US, they would be acting very differently.
¿Fue la victoria de Jackson sobre el Segundo Banco de los Estados Unidos un triunfo para la libertad, o simplemente amplió la autoridad federal con el pretexto de limitarla? Su legado es complejo, pero hay mucho que podemos aprender de él.
Los medios de comunicación están tratando de presentar la acusación formal contra James Comey de la semana pasada como un uso «rompedor de las normas» del poder ejecutivo para obtener beneficios personales.