Reimagining Public Safety: The Case for Privatizing Security
Instead of a state monopoly of security provision, for which citizens are coercively taxed and which often does not provide security, what viable alternatives exist?
Instead of a state monopoly of security provision, for which citizens are coercively taxed and which often does not provide security, what viable alternatives exist?
While “wokeness” seems to be a new phenomenon, the problems are tied to a sixty-year-old “landmark” law: the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This law, unfortunately, promotes government tyranny in the name of freedom.
While US taxpayers pay billions for military missions around the world in the name of “keeping us safe,” the federal government fails to keep residents of the nation’s capital safe from violent crime.
At the urging of a progressive prosecutor, a Michigan jury this week vastly expanded criminal law to convict parents of a school shooter who themselves had not broken the law.
While US taxpayers pay billions for military missions around the world in the name of “keeping us safe,” the federal government fails to keep residents of the nation’s capital safe from violent crime.
As government schools continue to propagate collectivist ideology, it is time for more parents to declare their independence and homeschool their children.
Much government regulation — and especially what we saw during the covid era — is downright illogical and produces harmful results. Perhaps some simple logic is in order.
David Gordon explains Murray Rothbard's famous assertion that laws against libel and slander should not be on the books.